Believe it or not, The New York Times hasn’t made Wordle any harder

Wordle, the daily guessing game that was just bought by the New York Times, is having a turbulent time on social media, with players complaining about the difficulty of the past few days.

This has frustrated players, who believe that the game’s new owners are intentionally increasing the difficulty (this story of how Wordle saved a woman’s life is not to be missed).

But , although conspiracy theories abound that the proliferation of difficult words is the fault of the managers of the New York Times, who sit in their large armchairs looking up extremely difficult words in the dictionary, the reality is quite different.

As the game’s creator, Josh Wardle, explained in an interview with the New York Times, he asked his partner Palak Shah (for whom the game was originally created as a gift) to help him reduce the roughly 12,000 possibilities to about 2,500 words she knew.

It is that list of words that constitutes Wordle’s suite of solutions, and the list is literally built into the Javascript of the website itself. It’s one of the reasons the game was so easy to save locally before the NYT buyout.

And as a quick comparison between the list of solutions before purchase and the current list of solutions in Word, it allows you to quickly check that we are dealing with the same game without modification.

5 websites to create your own Wordle-type word and logic games

The only change The New York Times made was to remove some words from the list of valid riddles for the game(namely, offensive language and insults), but that doesn’t affect the list of solutions.

The truth is that Wordle has always had difficult words. But the reality is that the American newspaper is not turning this game into a pastime for scholars and thinkers , Nothing of that. Also, that he is not interested, since his goal is to reach the widest possible audience.